46 Population Control Quotes That Show How Badly The Elite Want To Wipe Us All Out

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someoneShare on Google+

Many Eyes Watching - Public Domain

The global elite are absolutely obsessed with reducing the size of the global population.  As you will see from the quotes in this article, our “world leaders” think about the “problem” of overpopulation a lot.  Many of them are absolutely convinced that it is the greatest problem that humanity if facing today.  So what do they believe should be done about it?  That is where there is disagreement.  Some argue for very forceful measures, while others prefer a “softer” approach.  But the vast majority of them do agree that humans are a “plague” upon the earth and that we will literally destroy the planet if we are left to our own devices.  To the elite, everything from global warming to our growing economic problems can be directly traced back to the lack of population control.  They warn that if nothing is done about the exploding population, we will be facing a future full of poverty, war and suffering on a filthy, desolate planet.  They complain that it “costs too much” to keep elderly patients that are terminally ill alive, and they eagerly promote abortion for babies that are “not wanted” because they would be “too much of a burden” on society.  Anything that reduces the human population in any way is a good thing for those that believe in this sick agenda.  This twisted philosophy is being promoted in our movies, in our television shows, in our music, in our public schools, and it is being taught to our smartest students at colleges and universities on the planet.  The people promoting this philosophy have very, very deep pockets, and they are actually convinced that they are helping to “save the world” by trying to reduce the size of the human population.  In fact, many of them are entirely convinced that we are in a “life or death” struggle for the fate of the planet, and that if humanity does not willingly choose to embrace population control soon, then a solution will have to be “forced” upon them.

Yes, I know that all of this may sound like something out of a science fiction novel.  But there are a whole lot of people out there that are absolutely obsessed with this stuff, and many of them are in very prominent positions around the globe.

The following are 46 population control quotes that show just how badly the global elite want to wipe us all out…

1. Charles Darwin (his thinking is at the foundation of so many of our scientific theories today): “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state as we may hope, than the Caucasian and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”

2. Bill Gates: “The problem is that the population is growing the fastest where people are less able to deal with it. So it’s in the very poorest places that you’re going to have a tripling in population by 2050. (…) And we’ve got to make sure that we help out with the tools now so that they don’t have an impossible situation later.”

3. UK Television Presenter Sir David Attenborough: “We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now”

4. UN Under-Secretary-General Baroness Valerie Amos: “Population growth puts increased pressure on everything else…Girls and women must be educated. Even a few years’ basic education leads to smaller families.”

5. Paul Ehrlich, a former science adviser to president George W. Bush and the author of “The Population Bomb”: “Solving the population problem is not going to solve the problems of racism… of sexism… of religious intolerance… of war… of gross economic inequality. But if you don’t solve the population problem, you’re not going to solve any of those problems. Whatever problem you’re interested in, you’re not going to solve it unless you also solve the population problem.”

6. Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First: “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.”

7. CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

8. Japan’s Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso about medical patients with serious illnesses: “You cannot sleep well when you think it’s all paid by the government. This won’t be solved unless you let them hurry up and die.”

9. David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”

10. Richard Branson: “The truth is this: the Earth cannot provide enough food and fresh water for 10 billion people, never mind homes, never mind roads, hospitals and schools.”

11. Environmental activist Roger Martin: “On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.”

12. HBO personality Bill Maher: “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m for. It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.”

13. Al Gore: “One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principal ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children to have, the spacing of the children… You have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices.”

14. MIT professor Penny Chisholm: “The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.”

15. Julia Whitty, a columnist for Mother Jones: “The only known solution to ecological overshoot is to decelerate our population growth faster than it’s decelerating now and eventually reverse it—at the same time we slow and eventually reverse the rate at which we consume the planet’s resources. Success in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing global issues: climate change, food scarcity, water supplies, immigration, health care, biodiversity loss, even war. On one front, we’ve already made unprecedented strides, reducing global fertility from an average 4.92 children per woman in 1950 to 2.56 today—an accomplishment of trial and sometimes brutally coercive error, but also a result of one woman at a time making her individual choices. The speed of this childbearing revolution, swimming hard against biological programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat to date.”

16. Colorado State University Professor Philip Cafaro in a paper entitled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”: “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.

17. Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka: “I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.”

18. Kofi Annan, UN Secretary-General from 1997-2006: “The idea that population growth guarantees a better life — financially or otherwise — is a myth that only those who sell nappies, prams and the like have any right to believe.”

19. Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, UN Under-Secretary-General from 2000-2010: “We cannot confront the massive challenges of poverty, hunger, disease and environmental destruction unless we address issues of population and reproductive health.”

20. Detroit News Columnist Nolan Finley: “Since the national attention is on birth control, here’s my idea: If we want to fight poverty, reduce violent crime and bring down our embarrassing drop-out rate, we should swap contraceptives for fluoride in Michigan’s drinking water.

We’ve got a baby problem in Michigan. Too many babies are born to immature parents who don’t have the skills to raise them, too many are delivered by poor women who can’t afford them, and too many are fathered by sorry layabouts who spread their seed like dandelions and then wander away from the consequences.”

21. John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.”

22. Pope Francis: “Some people think that — excuse my expression here — that in order to be good Catholics we have to be like rabbits. No. Parenthood is about being responsible. This is clear.”

23. Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama 1950-present: “The growth in population is very much bound up with poverty, and in turn poverty plunders the Earth. When human groups are dying of hunger, they eat everything: grass, insects, everything. They cut down the trees, they leave the land dry and bare. All other concerns vanish. That’s why in the next 30 years the problems we call ‘environmental’ will be the hardest that humanity has to face.”

24. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”

25. Matthew Yglesias, a business and economics correspondent for Slate, in an article entitled “The Case for Death Panels, in One Chart”: “But not only is this health care spending on the elderly the key issue in the federal budget, our disproportionate allocation of health care dollars to old people surely accounts for the remarkable lack of apparent cost effectiveness of the American health care system. When the patient is already over 80, the simple fact of the matter is that no amount of treatment is going to work miracles in terms of life expectancy or quality of life.”

26. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class”

27. Gloria Steinem: “Everybody with a womb doesn’t have to have a child any more than everybody with vocal chords has to be an opera singer.”

28. Jane Goodall: “It’s our population growth that underlies just about every single one of the problems that we’ve inflicted on the planet. If there were just a few of us, then the nasty things we do wouldn’t really matter and Mother Nature would take care of it — but there are so many of us.”

29. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

30. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

31. Salon columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams in an article entitled “So What If Abortion Ends Life?”: “All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides.”

32. Paul Ehrlich: “Basically, then, there are only two kinds of solutions to the population problem. One is a ‘birth rate solution,’ in which we find ways to lower the birth rate. The other is a ‘death rate solution,’ in which ways to raise the death rate — war, famine, pestilence — find us.”

33. Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia and Francesca Minerva of the University of Melbourne in a paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics: “[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child.  Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”

34. Nina Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton: “We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”

35. Barack Obama’s primary science adviser, John P. Holdren: “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

36. David Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra Club: “Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”

37. Maurice Strong: “Either we reduce the world’s population voluntarily or nature will do this for us, but brutally.”

38. Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs: “There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”

39. Mikhail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”

40. Jacques Costeau: “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”

41. Television personality Kate Humble: “There are far too many people in the world…I think one of the most environmentally friendly things you can do is not to have children.”

42. Finnish environmentalist Pentti Linkola: “If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die”

43. Author Dan Brown: “Overpopulation is an issue so profound that all of us need to ask what should be done.”

44. Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”

45. Ashley Judd: “It’s unconscionable to breed, with the number of children who are starving to death in impoverished countries.”

46. Charles Darwin: “With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.”

There is so much more that could be said about all of this.

If you would like to learn more, the following are 10 of my previous articles about the population control agenda of the global elite…

#1 “The Population Control Agenda Is Being Relentlessly Pushed In American Public Schools

#2 “They Love Death

#3 “From 7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick Population Control Agenda Of The Global Elite

#4 “Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control

#5 “The Green Agenda Is About Getting Rid Of As Many Humans As Possible

#6 “Governments Around The World Are Eagerly Adopting The Strict Population Control Agenda Of The United Nations

#7 “Is The UN Using Vaccines To Secretly Sterilize Women All Over The Globe?

#8 “Hillary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy

#9 “Obamacare Architect Says Society Would Be Better Off If People Only Lived To Age 75

#10 “Why Does The U.S. Government Have An ‘Office Of Population Affairs’?

So what do you think about all of this?

Do you agree or disagree with the sick population control agenda of the global elite?

Please feel free to post a comment with your thoughts below…

Article authored by Michael Snyder, the author of The Beginning Of The End and Get Prepared Now!

  • old geezer

    Don’t know how many of these people are still alive, but if they would all gather and commit mass suicide, that would start the ball rolling!

  • DJohn1

    I contend that we have plenty of room for growth.
    What we do not have is a lot of leadership with innovation to handle the increased burden of population.
    The only ones served by decreasing the population are people that would depopulate the planet for their profit.
    It is going to take a very innovative leadership to handle the problems that come with increased population.
    We have 1/7th of the Earth. The other 6/7ths is under water.
    That means colonization of the continental shelves.
    That means gadgets to allow us to breath seawater.
    It also is going to mean new ways to feed people.
    We have to turn the deserts around and bring them back to fertile plains.
    We have the idea of colonizing other planets and moons in our Solar System.
    All of which is possible.
    We do need to take advantage of the vast array of talents provided by a diverse population.

  • Olaf Olson

    This website is a joke, and yes, overpopulation is a huge problem, especially in underdeveloped countires. Not everything is a conspiracy.

  • Bocephus Bakr Bourbonailstirre

    It is very true beyond a shadow of a doubt, at least, that we have no societal system, or even plan for that matter, to deal with our overpopulation. Yes, most, if not all of the problems these folks point out are very, very true. Its just death may not have to be our only solution…

  • RomertL

    There is no overpopulation, it’s a myth by the elite because they find it hard to control so many people, and they don’t need that many slaves anyway so why keep them? Especially now when it’s becoming feasible to use robots as slaves instead of people in many cases.

  • DJohn1

    The people that made this wealth would have found a much better solution than killing off the population.
    Every individual on the planet is potentially the one that might find a solution to the many problems we face as a species.
    The question I have is do we really need the elite not the other way around? I see them as slightly parasitic.
    The problem being that the people in the elite were put there mostly by being accidentally born into the right families. Royalty in Europe is a good example of this “elite”. The main problem they had was breeding too close to the family tree. The result was over 400 genetic diseases in future generations.
    If I were them, I would be actively breeding for long life, intelligence, talents, and healthy bodies during that lifespan. I would be breeding people to actually have the ability to lead the world. But I am not them and most likely will never be them.
    Instead they come up with this mess of Agenda 21 and other things to depopulate the planet. I find that a huge lack of imagination and wasted resources available to them as leaders. Our populations are a huge resource going to waste as it stands right now.
    I do not have the ability to memorize as well as I would like. I do not give up. I do fight my own battles. With that exception, I am fairly average. What I do have is an ability to see ideas, often in multiple directions. One of my children inherited that ability along with a good memory ability. He is genius level, not me.
    What we really need is to change society and the rules to give those talented individuals the best chance possible to exploit those talents to give everyone a better lifestyle of health and longer life. It means stopping the rules that keep people down.
    But as the armed forces say, we need to leave no individual behind in doing this mission. Fulfilling people’s potential has a tremendous resource towards a better world.
    We do need a flywheel of economic growth based on our ability to support everyone involved. That means new ways of feeding everyone on the planet. Because basically if you cannot feed the planet, it will destroy all of us. And that is what depopulation is really all about.
    These elite do not have a solution that works without a lot of bloodshed.

  • john

    but would all these people be willing to die ? Of course not. Like all good little liberals they want to use your life to solve the world ills, not theirs.

  • jeb

    Lol, pretty funny satire site, does a good job of imitating those nut jobs who actually believe this stuff!

  • Kelleigh Nelson

    I’m with you old geezer, and they can put Gates, Soros, the rotters in Congress, the present administration, most state Governors, and legislators, and a whole bunch more in that bag and start the ball rolling. In fact, they need to do it to show us how serious they are about population reduction!

  • Steven Hutchman

    Haha, you actually believe there is no overpopulation? Are you clinically blind?

  • Steven Hutchman
  • brian

    It’s ironic how your article actually makes good points for needing population control

  • RomertL

    Next time you fly, use eyes and look down. How much space is farmland, how much is wilderness, how much is cities? Now you use what’s BEHIND your eyes to draw conclusions. (Hint, if you overall see a lot of undeveloped land on the globe, we’re not overpopulated, if everything you se is developed, we might be

  • Emil Odin Hoff Tjore

    This article reeks of ignorance and paranoia.

  • pumpkin pie

    You’re wrong.

  • AmalekHaman

    Utter disinfo. Africa’s population is indeed growing extremely rapidly, whereas the world’s White population is plummeting. The problem with the mainstream is not that they want to stop Africa’s population from reaching 9 billion, but that they want to apply population reductions equally–i.e. to Whites who are already going extinct.

  • Jana
  • Michael

    I think the author here has misunderstood and misrepresented a lot of what is related in his post. Half the peopled mentioned are not a part of a “global elite”. But more importantly, the idea’s expressed by those quoted above are very serious considerations. Population growth and control need to be addressed in order to successfully engage policy concerning the environment, health-care, and poverty–not to mention the overall welfare of humanity and Earth itself

  • tcdelfin

    Wow..This is past shocking..

  • Steven Hutchman

    If that is your logic then obviously you have none.

  • RomertL

    If you can’t follow that simple logic, I really don’t know what to tell you

  • Steven Hutchman

    Guess what. You arent going to find people at the bottom of the ocean either. if your contention is that over population doesnt exist because there are places that people dont inhabit then you dont really understand what overpopulation means. It is about natural resources, adequate living conditions, pollution. The planet does not have the capabilities to sustain an exponentially growing population as we have in our modern world today. Especially in the poorer areas of the planet.

  • RomertL

    obviously i didn’t mean at the bottom of the ocean or in the middle of the desert etc, i thought i didn’t have to specify that…It can sustain a much larger population but there is limits of course

  • http://americathebattlefield.blogspot.com/ Timothy A. Pope

    Steven, if it’s really that important to you to depopulate the earth, then I nominate you to be the first to set the example for the rest of us. I’m sure we’re all going to miss you dearly.

  • Steven Hutchman

    I dont drive and I dont have kids, my contribution to pollution and overpopulation is far less than most. How about you?

  • Betsy Smith

    If you read the book of Revelation you will see that God Himself is going to eliminate many, many people because of their sins and unrepentant life style. But in the mean time, there is plenty of land and water for all, and many more people, who live on this earth. Don’t be deceived by the globalists and abortionists. Many of these people are Satan worshipers.

  • JCLincoln

    And it would also add about $200 Billion to the world’s economy to help the real hungry people.

  • pax256

    Its not the poor that are ruining the planet its the rich. The poor are exceedingly efficient at using what little resources they have access to. The poor in the mid east and Africa use 10% of the water of a westerner. Populate California with them and theres no drought anymore. Its the rich that own the economy and its resources and are cutting down the forests and polluting the waters and skirting every worker and environmental rule they can dodge by running off into any third world hellhole or buying off any politician they can find so they can make an extra buck. Its the rich that use 50% of food grains to make ethanol for their insane luxury vehicles that get 10 MPG. We could have 20 billion people (We wont ever, we will max out at 9-11 billion as we stop having kids when we get a somewhat modern economy) and a much smaller environmental footprint than we have now were it not for the system that made the likes of BIll Gates ridiculously rich and most of the rest of us paupers in comparison. 20 billion could fit in a modern city the size of Vancouver Island (yes build at least 10 stories high and theres ample room). Its the rich and the system they protect that is the problem. Those who insist on blaming the poor are blind. Those who arent blind are egotists and aspiring murderers. They just want the planet to themselves. If they keep at it its the planet and the rest of us that will reject them.

  • Christina

    So it sounds like the global elite are leading the depopulation plan. Stepping up and volunteering first is mighty commendable of them. Don’t you agree? I would love some feed back on this question.