Major Election Fraud Alert – Is This How They Are Going To Steal The Election From Donald Trump?

Election Fraud

Every ounce of effort that ordinary Americans have put into getting Donald Trump elected could be completely wasted if we allow them to steal the election. If you have confidence in the integrity of our elections, that confidence will be shaken by the time you are done reading this article, because I am about to share some information with you that is absolutely astounding. Yesterday, I showed you that dead people are being registered to vote right now and that they have been voting in elections across the country for years. I also showed you that illegal immigrants have been voting in important swing states such as Virginia and Pennsylvania. But all of that pales in comparison to the evidence of systematic election fraud that we witnessed on election day in 2012.

Because Mitt Romney threw in the towel very early on election night in 2012, very little scrutiny was given to the actual voting results. But if Romney had been willing to fight, there was actually quite a bit of evidence that the election was potentially stolen from him.

According to the Election Protection Coalition, voters all across America reported over 70,000 voting problems by five o’clock Eastern time on election day in 2012. In many instances, voters that were attempting to vote for Mitt Romney were having their votes switched to Barack Obama by the voting machines. We are going to look at some examples of this phenomenon below.

In particular, we want to focus on the swing states, because that is where most of the voting irregularities seem to have popped up. If you are going to steal an election, you don’t really care too much about the really “red states” or the really “blue states”. Rather, the key would be to shift enough votes in the tightly contested swing states to ensure a victory for your candidate. And so let’s take a look at what happened in some of the most important swing states during the last election.


During election night in 2012, the pundits breathlessly proclaimed that it was all going to come down to Ohio. They told us that if Mitt Romney was going to have any chance of winning the election that he had to win Ohio, and so that was the state to watch more than any other.

One of the counties where Barack Obama really needed to run up votes was in Cuyahoga County. But Barack Obama didn’t just solidly win in Cuyahoga County. In fact, there were 16 precincts were Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote.

Yes, you read that correctly.

Earlier today I went to the official Cuyahoga County website, and the results from the last election are still up. The following are the vote totals for Barack Obama and Mitt Romney in the precincts where Mitt Romney did not get any votes…

0154 CLEVELAND -02-Q: 542 – 0

0192 CLEVELAND -04-L: 388 – 0

0204 CLEVELAND -05-E: 597 – 0

0205 CLEVELAND -05-F: 483 – 0

0206 CLEVELAND -05-G: 257 – 0

0219 CLEVELAND -05-T: 386 – 0

0228 CLEVELAND -06-H: 405 – 0

0232 CLEVELAND -06-L: 70 – 0

0233 CLEVELAND -06-M: 419 – 0

0241 CLEVELAND -06-U: 118 – 0

0248 CLEVELAND -07-F: 361 – 0

0273 CLEVELAND -08-J: 472 – 0

0280 CLEVELAND -08-Q: 49 – 0

0285 CLEVELAND -09-B: 414 – 0

0288 CLEVELAND -09-E: 478 – 0

0523 EAST CLEVELAND -04-C: 486 – 0

There were also a whole host of precincts in Cuyahoga County where Mitt Romney received just one or two votes. Overall, Barack Obama won more than 99 percent of the vote in more than 100 precincts in just this one county.

How in the world does that happen?

Well, I think that what ordinary voters were telling reporters on election day in Ohio gives us a big clue. According to Fox News, there were voters in Ohio that said that they tried to vote for Romney but the voting machines kept switching their votes to Obama…

“I don’t know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me,” said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens.

Stevens said that when she voted, it took her three tries before the machine accepted her choice to vote for Romney.

“I went to vote and I got right in the middle of Romney’s name,” Stevens told Fox News, saying that she was certain to put her finger directly on her choice for the White House.

She said that the first time she pushed “Romney,” the machine marked “Obama.”

So she pushed Romney again. Obama came up again. Then it happened a third time.

“Maybe you make a mistake once, but not three times,” she told Fox News.

At the time, Fox News also reported that similar things were happening in Nevada, North Carolina and Texas, but once election day faded from memory nobody really seemed to care about these incidents anymore.


Pennsylvania is another very important swing state, and as the 2012 election approached the Romney campaign was actually somewhat optimistic that they may have a shot of winning the state.

And it turned out that Mitt Romney did win 55 out of the 67 counties in Pennsylvania, but he still managed to lose the entire state by a significant margin because of the crazy vote totals that Obama ran up in the urban areas.

If you can believe it, there were 59 voting divisions in the city of Philadelphia where Mitt Romney did not get one single vote.

The combined vote total for those 59 voting divisions was 19,605 for Barack Obama and 0 for Mitt Romney.

The odds of that happening by random chance are so low that they are not even worth mentioning.

So how does something like that happen?

Well, the overall voter turnout rate in the city of Philadelphia was approximately 60 percent on election day in 2012. But in the areas of the city where Republican poll watchers were illegally removed, the voter turnout rate was over 90 percent and Barack Obama received more than 99 percent of the vote.

You would think that the Republican Party should have screamed bloody murder about this, but instead they did absolutely nothing.

And once again, voting machines were switching votes from Mitt Romney to Barack Obama in Pennsylvania. The following was reported by WND at the time…

It was in Upper Macungie Township, near Allentown, Pa., where an auditor, Robert Ashcroft, was dispatched by Republicans to monitor the vote on Election Day. He said the software he observed would “change the selection back to default – to Obama.”

He said that happened in about 5 percent to 10 percent of the votes.

He said the changes appeared to have been made by a software program.

Ashcroft said the format for computer programming has a default status, and in this case it appeared to be designating a vote for Obama each time it went to default.

So would Mitt Romney have won the state of Pennsylvania if the voting had been fair?

We may never know the answer to that question.


In the critical swing state of Florida, there were also a number of key precincts where Barack Obama received 99 percent of the vote. The following was reported by Pundit Press

How exactly did he accomplish this? Well, in part thanks to Broward County Precincts L024 to L029 (though I’m sure it’s all a coincidence that this happened to precincts all in order).

In those precincts combined, all in order, Mr. Obama won over 99% of the vote, defeating Mitt Romney 5,392 to… 54. Golly, how lucky! This especially impressive because in precincts L019-L022 (L023 doesn’t exist) Mr. Romney did over 14 times better than in L024-L029, and the precinct after, did 30 times better.

Most Americans have never even heard any of this information. And remember, in this article we are looking at just a few examples from the most critical swing states. The truth is that these kinds of “statistical anomalies” were happening all over the nation.


In the important swing state of Virginia, a poll watcher named Dara Fox tried to sound the alarm about rampant voting fraud, and it should have made front page news all over the country. The following is what Fox told WMAL radio about what went down…

-That it appeared that voters for Obama were being bussed in.

-That many of them could not speak English at all.

-That many of them could not even tell poll workers the correct address on their identification cards.

-That many people were voting more than once at that same polling station throughout the day.


It appears that funny business was happening in swing states out west as well. Somehow, 10 counties in the key swing state of Colorado had a voter registration rate of more than 100 percent on election day in 2012.

Theoretically this is impossible. If all of the voting age people in your county registered to vote you could have a voter registration rate of 100 percent, but to go beyond that means that something is seriously wrong.

And yesterday I did show that authorities in Colorado have discovered that there is a “very serious” pattern of dead people casting votes in the state that goes back for many years.

This is why states should be allowed to require photo identification at voting locations. The integrity of our voting process has been compromised over and over again, and anyone that tries to steal an election is committing a crime against all of us.

It is a fact that Barack Obama did not win in a single state that required a photo I.D. to vote in 2012.

So what would the election results have looked like if all 50 states had required a photo I.D. to vote?

We can’t go back and change what happened in 2012, but we sure can do something about 2016.

If you see something strange when you go to vote in November, do not just keep it to yourself. If nobody in the mainstream media will listen to you, then contact me or someone else in the alternative media.

Collectively we need to scream bloody murder if they try to steal this election. And if there is one thing that we know about Donald Trump, it is that he is not afraid to file lawsuits. But the Trump campaign cannot be everywhere, and it is up to ordinary men and women to report any signs of trouble that they see or hear on election day.

If we will not fight election fraud, we might as well not even have any elections. Because what is the point of spending so much time and effort trying to get someone elected if we are just going to let them steal the elections from us?

*About the author: Michael Snyder is the founder and publisher of The Economic Collapse Blog and End Of The American Dream. Michael’s controversial new book about Bible prophecy entitled “The Rapture Verdict” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on*

10 thoughts on “Major Election Fraud Alert – Is This How They Are Going To Steal The Election From Donald Trump?”

  1. Christians: Between now and Election Day — pray, pray, pray to the Lord that He sovereignly ensures that votes are fairly tallied. God has many ways of working here.

    Have faith. Without it, it’s impossible to please Him (Hebrews 11:6).

  2. Truth is, there is actual evidence of voter fraud. Wikileaks just recently showed how Hillary Clinton won her party’s nomination without breaking a sweat. The fact that she hired on the DNC chair who corrupted the party for her as her own campaign surrogate shows that she is still up to her old tricks. I wouldn’t put it past her. Think about it. Why else would the Democrats want Muslims to come into this country without any real vetting? It is because they know that they can get Muslims to vote Democrat. I guarantee you — it isn’t because Muslims tolerate the gay…..

  3. The Clinton group does not have to use election fraud at this point in time.
    The latest scandal dug up by the opposition is true. He did say those things in moments of innocence when he cared less about an election 11 years ago.
    SO you have your Frank Burns(mash major in fictional fame) of republicans all running the opposite way when it comes to electing a real person for office that is full of faults and in civilian life was far from perfect. Frank Burns was the icon of what was wrong with all of us in the 50s and he always took the wrong and easy way out. Republicans imitate him is as far as I can see.
    Trump is right about one thing. They appear to be their own worst enemy and that keeps any republican from actually getting elected to the Presidency.
    Instead you have Hillary. How to describe someone like Hillary? Because she brings to the table a level of corruption unseen before in modern politics. There are actually books describing her level of corruption over the last 30 years or more. And they are not slander. They are true.
    So our choice comes down to Obnoxious Trump with his many dealings over the years and his obvious less than perfect attitudes over the years, but honestly said attitudes, or a professional liar and professional politician corrupted beyond belief.
    Right now as of last week he was about 20 electorial votes under Hillary. That means the Electorial College once again might go against the popular vote and elect the person the powers that be want in office rather than the person that should get elected.
    Somewhere in there, Trump apologized for being a jerk in 2005.
    Probably not enough to get elected anywhere in a really honest election because the Frank Burns of this world are better than us. They obviously have the politically correct high ground.
    At least until we elect them. Then they support organizations like Planned Parenthood that are responsible for numerous abortions.
    Trump is far from perfect. He is to this point in time been fairly honest about that.
    Our system of government allows checks and balances when the Congress actually does its job. No matter who gets to be in charge, those checks and balances are supposed to even things out.
    Under the current system the President(who ever that might be) has way too much power. We need to go back to a 3 tier system of government where no one branch has that much power.
    Once the door has been opened, it is impossible to bring all the horses back into a barn. Especially if that barn has been on fire.
    What Christians everywhere need to do is to get off their lazy behinds and do a moderate amount of research into just who we elect into office in the Congress.
    Just exactly what do they do once they get there and who are their masters.
    Jesus once said you will know them by their fruits. Well the fruits of both parties are very imperfect at this point in time.
    Has happened before, will probably happen again.
    If we want to break this power structure, elect an imperfect man.
    If you want to keep things the way they are . . . elect the opposition.

    • Does not matter who gets elected. Humanities future has already been foretold and it is materializing as prophesied by GOD’S WORD

  4. Incidentally, Trump chose an excellent candidate for President when he brought his Vice Presidential choice on board in Gov. Pence.
    If they had put Pence in the primary position, he might actually have won against Hillary.

Comments are closed.

The Most Important News