Their Endgame For The Flag, The National Anthem, The Declaration Of Independence And The Constitution

A huge national debate about our most important national symbols has erupted, and it is rapidly becoming one of our hottest political issues.  But what most people don’t realize is that this isn’t really a debate about our past.  Rather, it is a debate about what our future is going to look like.  Those that are demonizing the American flag, the national anthem, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are not doing so for the purpose of winning a historical debate.  Their true goal is to “cancel” those symbols and replace them with new ones, because our existing national symbols represent values and principles that are diametrically opposed to the values and principles that they wish to impose upon society.

If they ultimately get their way, the United States will eventually become an extremely repressive high tech dystopian society where absolutely no dissent is tolerated.  In other words, we would look a whole lot like communist China does today.

When I was growing up, the “godless communists” on the other side of the globe were the “bad guys”, and I was raised to greatly love the flag and the freedoms that it represented.  But now our flag is regularly demonized by the corporate media.  For example, the New York Times just published an article in which the flag was described as “alienating”

What was once a unifying symbol — there is a star on it for each state, after all — is now alienating to some, its stripes now fault lines between people who kneel while “The Star-Spangled Banner” plays and those for whom not pledging allegiance is an affront.

And it has made the celebration of the Fourth of July, of patriotic bunting and cakes with blueberries and strawberries arranged into Old Glory, into another cleft in a country that seems no longer quite so indivisible, under a flag threatening to fray.

At one time, it would have been unthinkable for a major newspaper to publish such a statement, but times have changed.

And calls for our existing flag to be replaced with a new one are starting to grow louder.  The following comes from a widely circulated opinion piece that singer Macy Gray authored last month

President Biden, Madame Harris and members of Congress: the American flag has been hijacked as code for a specific belief. God bless those believers, they can have it. Like the Confederate, it is tattered, dated, divisive, and incorrect. It no longer represents democracy and freedom. It no longer represents ALL of us. It’s not fair to be forced to honor it. It’s time for a new flag.

Of course it isn’t just the flag that they want to replace.

Right now, there is a petition that is calling for a new national anthem

The petition, started by Lawrence Johnson, cites three reasons why the national anthem should be changed:

The “Star Spangled Banner” contains “racism,” elitism and even sexism embedded in its third and fourth stanzas, which have no place in the national anthem of a democracy that claims that all men (and women) are created equal, the petition says.

That particular petition is suggesting that “American The Beautiful” should be the new anthem, but a lot of people are also now referring to “Lift Every Voice And Sing” as a “national anthem”

PBS has sparked tense backlash with its decision to have Vanessa Williams perform the “black national anthem” during its July 4 coverage — with critics blasting the move as divisive and un-American.

Williams’ performance on the station’s annual Capitol Fourth program Sunday evening is intended to celebrate the recognition of Juneteenth’s establishment as a federal holiday.

In the end, they aren’t going to be satisfied with changing just one or two things.

The goal is for all of the symbols of our founding era to be “canceled”, and this even includes our most important founding documents.

Earlier today, I was stunned to learn that NPR is now publicly claiming that the Declaration of Independence is filled with “flaws and hypocrisies”

In an online article, NPR stated: ‘Over the past 32 years, Morning Edition has broadcast a reading of the Declaration of Independence by NPR staff as a way of marking Independence Day.

‘But after last summer’s protests and our national reckoning on race, the words in the document land differently.’

In reference to the ‘flaws and hypocrisies’ within the historic document, NPR wrote: ‘It famously declares “that all men are created equal” even though women, enslaved people and Indigenous Americans were not held as equal at the time.’

And Congresswoman Maxine Waters is publicly attacking it as well

July 4th… & so, the Declaration of Independence says all men are created equal. Equal to what? What men? Only white men?

“All men are created equal” is a phrase that has been a beacon of hope for men and women all over the globe for more than two centuries, but now Maxine Waters would like us to believe that it is actually an insult.

Sadly, I am certain that it won’t be too long before someone out there comes up with a “new Declaration of Independence” to replace the old one.

Of course the U.S. Constitution is under relentless assault as well.  When I was in law school, my liberal professors taught me that it was a “living, breathing document” that could be changed to make it say anything that we wanted it to say.

But these days that is not enough for many on the left.  A lot of them now want to get rid of that “flawed” document entirely and start over.

The endgame is to create an entirely different country from the one that our founders originally established, and every year they make a little bit more progress toward that goal.

Of course there are still millions of patriotic Americans that are absolutely determined to keep them from winning, but the other side has far more money and far more power at this stage.

This is a point that Victor Davis Hanson made very well in one of his recent articles

Name one mainline institution that the woke left does not now control — and warp. The media? The campus? Silicon Valley? Professional sports? The corporate boardroom? Foundations? The K-12 educational establishment? The military hierarchy? The government deep state? The FBI top echelon?

The left absorbed them all. But this time around, members of the left really believe that “by any means necessary” is no mere slogan. Instead, it is a model of how to disrupt or destroy American customs, traditions and values.

All throughout our history, Americans have sacrificed so much so that future generations could live free.

But now all of our precious freedoms are on the line, and the other side is absolutely determined to permanently destroy everything that our founders worked so hard to build.

We have reached such a critical moment in our history, and America’s future hangs in the balance.

***Michael’s new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.***

About the Author: My name is Michael Snyder and my brand new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available on  In addition to my new book, I have written four others that are available on including The Beginning Of The EndGet Prepared Now, and Living A Life That Really Matters. (#CommissionsEarned)  By purchasing the books you help to support the work that my wife and I are doing, and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the globe.  I have published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse BlogEnd Of The American Dream and The Most Important News, and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe.  I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites, but I also ask that they include this “About the Author” section with each article.  The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only, and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal, business, financial or health decisions.  I encourage you to follow me on social media on FacebookTwitter and Parler, and any way that you can share these articles with others is a great help.  During these very challenging times, people will need hope more than ever before, and it is our goal to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with as many people as we possibly can.

8 thoughts on “Their Endgame For The Flag, The National Anthem, The Declaration Of Independence And The Constitution”

  1. Its not a “huge” debate. Its a miniscule bunch of America haters venting. The majority love their country,flag and anthem. These haters need to get their history right and quit twisting it in knots to suit their agenda. Most people would die for their country and flag so bring their rage against us and lets see what happens…

    • The end game for us all has been decided and backed by the Courts.

      But no one asked me did I agree with this culling of the herd. When the Legal Courts refused to take on the obvious fraudulent election, the rule of law broke down at that point.
      The Republic needs law courts not Legal Courts. The people want and need law, the Legal Arena is dominated by the British Approved Registry [BAR] freemasons. How can this be challenged when the judges owe allegiance else where to the freemasons.

      The freemasons were instrumental in writing the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. They did a good job. We the People, the People is the capacity needed to institute a court of law not a Legal Court. The government is a fictional legal entity [govern-enforce a set of rules, ment-of the mind] and they want the people to change their lawful capacity to that which is compatible with the government, so they can enforce their fictional contracts on your legal fiction, they trick you into thinking that the Mr. John DOE summoned to court is you. They create a legal fiction for you Mr John Doe, to be able to contract with you. The government is not real, how could you pick the government up? what would you hold onto? the people are real not fictional.

      How are you able to identify your legal fiction that is provided by the government?
      Do you write your name like this John Doe? thought so. But some letters are addressed to Mr John Doe or Mr John DOE which means that the government is trying to fool you into thinking that the letter is addressed to you. The signers did not sign the Declaration as Mr. [ document]

      Be careful, the letter is the opening move in a game, a game that would make chess uninteresting and is far more complex which is why lawyers are needed to re-present you at court, all Brothers with BAR cards.

      If you attend the legal courts with a lawyer how can you win? they cannot allow a result that goes against policy or the puppet masters would soon be exposed. By accepting the oaths of office you can then claim the protections embodied in the oaths. Accept the Declaration, it is for the people, study the declaration. The reasons that brought about the Declaration are written into it. You could write another Declaration and catalogue the abuses to date and use the existing Constitution as your Authority.

      Accept the Constitution, establish this lawful contract at law.

      When you, as a man of the people accept the oaths, then you establish a contract under law and all the legal complexities disappear. You proceed under law rules not legal rules. The rule of law not the rule of legal.
      “the Court has read the preamble as bearing witness to the fact that the Constitution emanated from the people and was not the act of sovereign and independent States. McCulloch v. Maryland,

      Accept the Bill of Rights as John Doe man of the people and also accept the judicial oath of office. Madison proposed the following constitutional amendments:

      “First. That there be prefixed to the Constitution a declaration, that all power is originally vested in, and consequently derived from, the people.

      That Government is instituted and ought to be exercised for the benefit of the people; which consists in the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the right of acquiring and using property, and generally of pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.

      That the people have an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform or change their Government, whenever it be found adverse or inadequate to the purposes of its institution.”

      Under law an easy way to establish if the peoples rights are being abused is to always measure the supposed harm against this, “Harm No One”. If the action or actions abuses this admitted truth, then the rest is deducible. [A Priori]

      That the people have an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform or change their Government, whenever it be found adverse or inadequate to the purposes of its institution.

      It seems as if this was written for todays covidiot plandemic and these rights cannot be taken away whether they have been ratified or not, a right is a right and unalienable but can be watered down or taken away by the legal system. The people are the font of all and can only agree to the Constitution or Peoples Contract if the various items contained in the Constitution are applied and carried out.

      We pass our consent to the Constitution in a special way. We “trust” the government to abide by the terms of the Peoples Contract, The Constitution of the United States of America, if that trust is broken in any way then the government loses its authority to continue. It is the peoples authority, passed under trust, to the government. The people are the Grantor of the trust and also the Beneficiary, that makes the government the Trustee. All offices of government can only be as Trustee as are the judges. You as a man of the people are also Beneficiary and can receive no harm from the Trustee.

      This information is not generally known to the people but is known to the judges and legal experts who work for the government. Trust law is basically a Chancery Court case where equity rules the outcome.

      The above is the basics, there is much more to understand. Lawyers use a special language called Legalese where some words and expressions change their meanings. Written into the Declaration is the expression the “common law”, but if you attend court and ask for the common law, it sounds like Common Law but this is not “common law”.

      From whence did the common law arise? It is not mentioned in the Magna Carta 1215. It may only exist as a trap, to encourage you to ask for “common law”. The added benefit is that the Judge can interpret your words as meaning the Common Law and then you are under precedent and legal rules.

      It is the right of any of the people to do what is outlined, exercise this right. Accept the Judicial oath of office as a man of the people and then you can claim the protections that have been so thoughtfully seeded throughout the various documents and oaths of office.

      I have written this article in the hope that the editor will contact me. I can offer more information that will complete the outline that I have posted based on my court room experiences and research.

  2. This will all be settled once and for all when the people who just want to be left alone are forced to respond.

  3. PBS is a Joke, it has become since 2001 , a downward spiral of communist propaganda garbage akin to radio havana Cuba and Burma in asia, the whole NFL kneeling horse puckey is embarrassing, and creating fake holi-daze out of thin air is insulting, there is NO holiday for reaL on June 10th, totally laughable, so sad for all the radical atheists, when Christ returns in 2022 and ”cleans house”, we are counting the days.

    ===Todd & Cora
    ohio st Univ

  4. “Never invade a country that is not already conquered.” Sun Tzu. This is just another aspect of cultural genocide preceding the knockout sucker punch that gets the USA off the Prison Planet.


Comments are closed.

The Most Important News