INVESTIGATION: Three days before Dr. Bradstreet was found dead in a river, U.S. govt. agents raided his research facility to seize a breakthrough cancer treatment called GcMAF

Bloody Handprint - Public Domain

Over the last few days, we’ve learned that before being found shot in the chest and floating in the river, pioneering medical researcher Dr. Bradstreet was working with a little-known molecule that occurs naturally in the human body. Called, “GcMAF”, this molecule has the potential to be a universal cancer cure for many people. It has also been shown to reverse signs of autism in the vast majority of patients receiving the treatment.

While GcMAF is perfectly legal as a treatment in dozens of advanced nations around the world, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has outlawed it, calling it an “unapproved drug.” It is with this designation — an effort to suppress the forward progress of medical science — that the U.S. government conducted a raid on Dr. Bradstreet’s clinic, specifically seeking to confiscate GcMAF in order to shut down his research and halt his treatment of patients. Meanwhile, Big Pharma gets special permission to unleash untested, experimental drugs on the public as long as those drugs earn sufficient profits.

(Read the rest of the story here…)

***If you are a news addict, be sure to bookmark The Most Important News and visit on a daily basis for the very best breaking news, articles and videos from all over the Internet!***

1 thought on “INVESTIGATION: Three days before Dr. Bradstreet was found dead in a river, U.S. govt. agents raided his research facility to seize a breakthrough cancer treatment called GcMAF”

  1. What we have is terminal lawyer/doctor syndrome. Between the lawyers and the greedy doctors they are killing patients by keeping effective treatments from being used both here and in Britain.
    Now we have them hiring hit men to kill the doctors that refuse to tow the line?
    Maybe it is time to bring a halt to these greedy people practicing law and medicine. Treating illness with law is just plain wrong.
    There was a king once in a small city in the way of Attilla the Hun. He had conquered the city and the king was brought before him.
    I am having my men rape and pillage your city. What say you?
    The king thought for a moment. Who’s city is it now?
    Attilla thought a moment. Why it is my city, he replied.
    So you are raping your women and plundering your city?
    Immediately Attilla stopped all the pillaging and rape. When he was ready to move on, he put the former king in charge of “his” city.
    We have a similar situation. If effective treatments are denied, the very men benefiting from the lack of a cure will eventually die of the diseases they have prevented from being cured. Ironically they are their own “cure” for the situation.
    We are all in the end mortal. We all will die from something someday.
    So their ill-begotten gains by denying people cures for these diseases will backfire big time somewhere down the road of their lives.
    I suggest we need an overhaul of both the laws directing treatment and the medical people backing such laws.
    If these laws were in effect, at one time it would be illegal to treat anyone except with leeches drawing blood.
    Maybe the leeches have moved on and now control medicine and law.

Comments are closed.